Tuesday, 26 February, 2008

" IDI SANGATHI" Movie Review



Diamonds. You can do so many things with them. Make movies, for example. A whole lot of Hindi movies came out in the recent past with that subject, and now Idi Sangathi has robbery-greed-diamonds-guilt-redemption as it's basic plot. The screenplay could have been so much more interesting in the hands of another director. Unfortunately, Chandra Siddharth, who made a decent start with Aa Naluguru seems to have backed on solid writing and structure in his debut that seems to be lacking in Idi Sangathi.

Abbas and TabuPlot Mumbai Express meets with an accident, and Murthy, a crime reporter for a newspaper and his photographer are the first to arrive. Instead of gathering information, Murthy loots the dead passengers' ornaments and suitcases and gets it home to his wife, Swarajyam. The suitcase he brings home has 500 crores worth diamonds-all the assets of the Prime Minister converted into diamonds and being transferred to Hyderabad. Swarajyam discovers this, and without revealing it to her husband, she makes her own plans and their lives change with the entry of this secret and black treasure.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The story is kept basic, while the moral siding is obviously against any greed. The movie paints a dark picture, and everyone is either black or grey, never white. With some stereotyped (but admittedly real) characters and satirical undertones, the movie starts off and progresses slowly. The scene is set, the cards are dealt and now it's time for the players to play their turn. The 'Interval Twist' is a deception, and Raja's cameo is wasteful.

It starts off as a satirical, aims half-heartedly at some comedy and rounds off with a nice little moral lesson about greed. Not all of it is kept simple or logical either, but it is predictable. The nonchalance to greed and the insensitivity to grief are shown well. Another plus is the duration, which is kept short. The reality in some of the scenes might be hard to accept, but it is undeniable.

It is a simple narrative, but has no novelty or real entertainment value. With the same concept, better screenplay, dialogues and performances, the movie would have been a lot of fun and a statement on the kind of society it is today without exaggeration. But Idi Sangathi never gets there, and does not really have any Sangathi to bank on.

RajaPerformances Tabu's character is neither well-written nor complex. Even Amani's loud and flat character in Subhalagnam as a wife who 'sells' her husband for a crore is more interesting than Swarajyam. An artiste of Tabu's caliber is therefore wasted, and what more, she's even made to ham in some scenes in the first half-the dubbed voice is not particularly suitable for Tabu. Abbas is good and he sensibly keeps a low profile throughout, which suits the tone of his character. Suneel is okay, ditto Brahmaji. Hema as Suneel's wife keeps the energy level up in her brief role, while Kota as the Prime Minister is good. MS Narayana as his PA gets a giggle or two from the audience.

Song and Dance The leads to the songs are just terrible. The songs themselves are unnecessary, but treated as a necessary evil. The actual picturization and compositions are average.

End Cedits:
Staring:
Abbas, Tabu, Raja, Brahmaji, Kota Srinivasa Rao, MS Narayana, Surya, Suneel, Hema, Chalapathi Rao, Devadas Kanakala, Melkote and Others.
Art: T. Nagendra Prasad.
Choreography: Pony Verma.
Cinematography: JK Gummadi.
Lyrics: Chaitanya Prasad-Peddada Murthy.
Music: John P. Varkey.
Story & Dialogues: KNY Pathanjali.
Executive Producer: VV Durga Prasad.
Producer, Screenplay & Direction: Chandra Siddharth.
Banner: Filmotsav.
Release Date: 22nd February, 2008.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

"ANDAMAINA MANASULO" Movie Review



Andamaina Manasulo, composer Patnaik's directorial debut, is a simple love story about a young girl's infatuation turning into love for an older man. There is some humor infused into it with Suneel and the late Laxmipathy's amusing track, the lead actor Rajeev makes a good debut and there are two hummable numbers. The movie drags after a point in the second half towards the climax and the theme might not be to everyone's liking.

Ramya & RajeevPlot Tushar and Sandhya are college sweethearts, but Sandhya marries someone else for her parents' sake and never returns. Tushar is heart-broken, but immerses himself in his studies and eventually into getting a doctorate. He has no family, but is close to school kid Bindu whose father works in the campus and they live nearby. Bindu's friendship grows into infatuation and then love, and she grows up to find herself in love with Tushar, who is now older and wiser-and dreads marriage. Bindu tries to tell her love for him, while Tushar still treats her like a child. Sandhya returns, but Bindu's dilemma is only Tushar's rejection.

Story, Screenplay and Direction As a story, it is slightly different from the regular stuff. As a theme, the age-gap conflict has been analyzed and written about time and again, with diverse results. Here the conflict is not merely a 8 year gap, but Tushar being a college going guy while Bindu is still a kid, and having known her since then, he cannot seem to think of her differently even after she grows up. That could have been a messy affair, but Patnaik handles that deftly. Some of the supporting cast has done a good job and that holds the movie together despite the weak narrative.

His directorial skills still need to be honed, but he goes by a formula to a certain extent-ample doses of comedy, getting into the dynamics of the very volatile relationship Tushar and Bindu share, a gimmick here and there (like Patnaik's wasteful cameo, a song with some composers at the playback); and a good finish even though after Sandhya re-enters their lives, the movie loses its grip. Patnaik has good sensibilities in terms of creating and understanding some characters, both flat and round, but with the conception of scenes and the pace in the screenplay, he will need time to blossom.

Lip sync is a major issue, as some of the dialogues seem to have been revised while dubbing a lot. Some illogical parts make you squirm in your seat, including Sandhya's re-entry without any hullabaloo and a component of the climax (that would be a spoiler). Some of the scenes between Tushar and Sandhya are not executed that well, but those with Tushar and Bindu as a kid are filled with good repartee and chemistry without making it ugly.

RajeevPerformances Rajeev makes a good debut even in a tricky role that requires him to age a few years but not more than that. He changes his body language along with just hair-makeup and that's definitely a promising start. Suneel (who plays Tushar's dance teacher friend Emmanuel) and the late Laxmipathy (as Emmanuel's assistant) share excellent on-screen chemistry; Laxmipathy was a good but underrated artiste and seems to have gotten his due in this last movie of his. Archana and Ramya as the female leads are inconsistent. The child artiste who played Bindu is good. Maruti Rao's cameo after a long time is used well, Patnaik's was unnecessary.

Song and Dance Ammayi Navvindi (with some composers at the playback), Andala Chandamama and Ready Ready are hummable.

Last Word Different casting choices, better music and a crisper second half's second half would have made it a good movie. In its present state, it is a heart-felt attempt to create something different, but an average movie.

End Credits:
Starring:
Rajeev, Archana Gupta, Ramya, Suneel, Gollapudi Maruthi Rao, Laxmipathy, and Others.
Art: A. Ramanjaneyulu.
Cinematography: Santosh Rai Pataji.
Dialogues & Lyrics: Kulasekhar.
Editing: KV Krishna Reddy.
Story, Screenplay, Music & Direction: RP Patnaik.
Producer: SV Babu.
Banner: SV Productions.
Release Date: 14th February, 2008.

Labels:

Monday, 18 February, 2008

"JODHAA AKBAR" Movie Review



Jodhaa AkbarAshutosh Gowarikar stuck to his word. The promos said 'A Mogul Prince A Rajput Princess’. And yes, the movie is all about them. It is an interesting love story even in writing, and on the silver screen it makes for an extremely difficult subject to tackle and a tricky job to decide what to fictionalize and what not to; what to keep in and what to avoid. Jalaluddin 'Akbar’, one of the most prominent and popular emperors ever, creates and keeps the interest levels up even to this day. Hrithik Roshan and Ashwarya as the protagonists of this magnum opus, the spectacle Gowarikar creates with the sets, the period setting and the atmosphere, the music-all make Jodha-Akbar a worthwhile one-time watch.

The Mogul emperor’s arranged marriage to a Hindu princess and the conflict that the union leads to because of and in spite of it is Jodha Akbar. The movie captures the events that lead to the marriage with a little background added for good measure and the couple’s early wedded life. The princess bent on keeping her own identity and her faith intact, the Muslim clergy trying to influence a tolerant Akbar, the misunderstandings and the wars are all covered.

There are some beautiful moments in the movie that negate its tiring length. Akbar joins the Sufi singers in their mystic dance, Jodha’s prayer for Lord Krishna rings through the court just as the Mullahs discuss her religious beliefs and other such small but significant events. The characters of Akbar, Jodha, Sujamal and others are very well-defined yet volatile enough to pull the story forward. Gowarikar’s usual pace makes the viewer appreciate the sheer effort spent in making a movie like this, giving minor and major details importance. Subtle humor comes into play at times, and Akbar’s character is given new magnitudes with him refusing to cut off the defeated King’s head on one hand and ordering a traitor to be thrown twice from the terrace to ensure his death on the other.

The unconventional characters and fates of the main leads are difficult to pull off, especially in this screenplay. It could have been a highly watchable, even enjoyable movie if the story was a little different post-break. The action sequences in the first half are good, while those in the second half get very repetitive. Background score and re-recording is good.

The editing, however, could have cut the movie another 15 minutes short at the very least. Since the story revolves around the two central characters and their story, the focus is on them and the events that surround the early period in their marriage along with Akbar’s formative years. Some characters tend to have a very flat portraiture, like the evil scheming Mahan Anga (with whom Jodha’s animosity makes for some powerful and intense bits) and Akbar’s greedy brother-in-law.

Jodhaa AkbarHrithik steals the show with his absolutely flawless performance, and possibly his best yet. In majority of the scenes, one sees Jalaluddin Mohamed Akbar and not Hrithik Roshan, as would have occurred with all the other big stars. Ashwarya makes the perfect princess even if she does ham a little in the emotional scenes, her body language and the way she pulled off Jodha Bai is commendable. The magic of the movie lies a lot in its casting and the chemistry of the lead pair, where we see the characters and less of the actors. Credit must be bestowed upon the director also for this particular gift he has of creating those characters. Ila Arun as Mahan Anga gives a credible performance while Punam Sinha as Akbar’s mother and Sonu Sood as Jodha’s brother do a good job. Another aspect that is notable is the make-up and the costumes, which are a visual treat. To add to the visual aspect, the photography is really good. Background score is a little too loud at times, but otherwise the music is overall a highlight for the movie. The action sequences, all but one, are conceived and executed well.

The two songs have excellent choreography. Jodha Akbar is an engaging movie for anyone vaguely interested or enlightened about history. The dialogues in Urdu and Hindi are kept relatively simple, but for people unfamiliar with anything but present-day colloquial Hindi, it might be a tad bit difficult to follow. For the effort itself, Gowarikar is to be appreciated. The length is a definite minus but the pace is just right. For the action sequences, the music and Hrithik, the movie captures the attention of the viewer. Gowarikar’s Swades might not have become a commercial hit, but it nevertheless remains a good movie. Whatever the trade verdict is on Jodha Akbar, barring some wasteful minutes, it is a movie made with a lot of conviction and is to be looked at as a work of fiction based on historical events.

End Credits
Starring:
Hrithik Roshan, Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, Sonu Sood, Kulbhushan Kharbanda, Suhasini Mulay, Ila Arun, Digvijay Purohit, Shaji Chowdhary, Nikitin Dheer, Visswa Badola, Pradeep Sharma, Raza Murad, Yuri and Others.
Choreography: Chinni Prakash-Rekha Prakash-Raju Khan.
Cinematography: Kiiran Deohans.
Co-producer: Zarina Mehta-Deven Khote.
Costumes: Neeta Lulla.
Dialogues: KP Saxena.
Editing: Ballu Saluja.
Executive Producer: Sunita A. Gowariker.
Lyrics: Javed Akhtar.
Music: AR Rehman.
Production Design: Nitin Chandrakant Desai.
Screenplay: Haidar Ali-Ashutosh Gowariker.
Sound Design: Stephen Gomes.
Sound Re-recording: Hitendra Ghosh.
Story: Haidar Ali.
Stunt Co-ordinator: Ravi Dewan.
Direction: Ashutosh Gowariker.
Producer: Ronnie Screwvala-Ashutosh Gowariker.
Banner: UTV Motion Pictures-Ashutosh Gowariker Productions.
Release Date: 15th February, 2008.

Labels: , , , , ,

" ANDAMAINA MANASULO" Movie Review



Ramya & RajeevAndamaina Manasulo, composer Patnaik's directorial debut, is a simple love story about a young girl's infatuation turning into love for an older man. There is some humor infused into it with Sunil and the late Laxmipathy's amusing track, the lead actor Rajiv makes a good debut and there are two hummable numbers. The movie drags after a point in the second half towards the climax and the theme might not be to everyone's liking.

Plot Tushar and Sandhya are college sweethearts, but Sandhya marries someone else for her parents' sake and never returns. Tushar is heart-broken, but immerses himself in his studies and eventually into getting a doctorate. He has no family, but is close to school kid Bindu whose father works in the campus and they live nearby. Bindu's friendship grows into infatuation and then love, and she grows up to find herself in love with Tushar, who is now older and wiser-and dreads marriage. Bindu tries to tell her love for him, while Tushar still treats her like a child. Sandhya returns, but Bindu's dilemma is only Tushar's rejection.

Story, Screenplay and Direction As a story, it is slightly different from the regular stuff. As a theme, the age-gap conflict has been analyzed and written about time and again, with diverse results. Here the conflict is not merely a 8 year gap, but Tushar being a college going guy while Bindu is still a kid, and having known her since then, he cannot seem to think of her differently even after she grows up. That could have been a messy affair, but Patnaik handles that deftly. Some of the supporting cast has done a good job and that holds the movie together despite the weak narrative.

His directorial skills still need to be honed, but he goes by a formula to a certain extent-ample doses of comedy, getting into the dynamics of the very volatile relationship Tushar and Bindu share, a gimmick here and there (like Patnaik's wasteful cameo, a song with some composers at the playback); and a good finish even though after Sandhya re-enters their lives, the movie loses its grip. Patnaik has good sensibilities in terms of creating and understanding some characters, both flat and round, but with the conception of scenes and the pace in the screenplay, he will need time to blossom.

Lip sync is a major issue, as some of the dialogues seem to have been revised while dubbing a lot. Some illogical parts make you squirm in your seat, including Sandhya's re-entry without any hullabaloo and a component of the climax (that would be a spoiler). Some of the scenes between Tushar and Sandhya are not executed that well, but those with Tushar and Bindu as a kid are filled with good repartee and chemistry without making it ugly.

RajeevPerformances Rajiv makes a good debut even in a tricky role that requires him to age a few years but not more than that. He changes his body language along with just hair-makeup and that's definitely a promising start. Sunil (who plays Tushar's dance teacher friend Emmanuel) and the late Laxmipathy (as Emmanuel's assistant) share excellent on-screen chemistry; Laxmipathy was a good but underrated artiste and seems to have gotten his due in this last movie of his. Archana and Ramya as the female leads are inconsistent. The child artiste who played Bindu is good. Maruti Rao's cameo after a long time is used well, Patnaik's was unnecessary.

Song and Dance Ammayi Navvindi (with some composers at the playback), Andala Chandamama and Ready Ready are hummable.

Last Word Different casting choices, better music and a crisper second half's second half would have made it a good movie. In its present state, it is a heart-felt attempt to create something different, but an average movie.

End Credits
Starring:
Rajeev, Archana Gupta, Ramya, Sunil, Gollapudi Maruthi Rao, Lakshmipathy, and Others.
Art: A. Ramanjaneyulu.
Cinematography: Santosh Rai Pataji.
Dialogues & Lyrics: Kulasekhar.
Editing: KV Krishna Reddy.
Music: RP Patnaik.
Story: RP Patnaik.
Screenplay: RP Patnaik.
Direction: RP Patnaik.
Producer: SV Babu.
Banner: SV Productions.
Release Date: 14th February, 2008.

Labels: , , , , , ,

"ONTARI" Movie Review



Ontari starring Gopichand and newbie Bhavana has a good screenplay and credible performances but the climax is a downer. It becomes a regular revenge story and becomes humdrum after a promising start.

Plot Vamsi has a big happy family with parents, siblings and their spouses. Into his life comes Bujji who he falls in love with and after some hurdles, she reciprocates. She is eve-teased by Ajay, who is the brother of Lal Mahankali, an influential rowdy. Vamsi saves her, earns her love but also earns the wrath of Mahankali and his gang.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The first half of Ontari is good. If viewed in entirety, then the direction and performances are good but the basic plot doesn't work out especially towards the end. The last one hour when the suspense is over and it turns into a seen-before revenge drama pulls the movie down. The screenplay is present day inserted with flashbacks throughout.

The unconventional characters and fates of the main leads are difficult to pull off, especially in this screenplay. It could have been a highly watchable, even enjoyable movie if the story was a little different post-break. The action sequences in the first half are good, while those in the second half get very repetitive. Background score and re-recording is good.

The scene where Bujji introduces Vamsi to his own family as her boyfriend, the family sequences and sprinkling of humor in the first half is good. The scene where Vamsi and Ali (playing a waiter) interact finishes off the suspense about Bujji and the movie takes a different road from there. Incidentally, a movie starring Vadde Naveen called 'Naa Oopiri' has a similar storyline.

Gopichand and BhavanaPerformances Gopichand has the movie on his shoulders, and does a good job portraying a slightly complex character. Bhavana debuts in Telugu, and she gives a credible performance. Ashish Vidyarthi and Ajay are convincing in negative roles. Rajeev Kanakala plays a brief but key role well.

Song and Dance Three of the songs including 'Ararey Yemadi' are good with nice picturizations.

Last Word Ontari starts off with much promise, but goes downhill towards the climax. It's difficult to carry off a theme and characters such as Ontari's, and the movie seems to walk on a tightrope once it gives way to predictability post-break.

End Credits
Staring:
Gopichand, Bhavana, Rajeev Kanakala, Naresh, Paruchuri Venkateswara Rao, Ashish Vidyarthi, Ajay, Supreeth, Sayaji Shinde and Others.
Action: 'Gilli' Sekhar-Vijay.
Cinematography: Sarvesh Murari.
Dialogues: Marudhuri Raja-Bashasri.
Editing: Goutham Raju.
Lyrics: Bhaskarabhatla-Ramajogaiah Sastry-Bashasri.
Music: Mani Sharma.
Story: Etharam Films Unit.
Screenplay & Direction: Ramana BV.
Producer: Pokuri Baburao.
Presenter: Pokuri Ramarao.
Banner: Etharam Films.
Release Date: 14th February, 2008.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, 8 February, 2008

"VISAKHA EXPRESS" Movie Review

Vara Mullapudi has come up with a good suspense thriller. The film is quite racy and the gripping screenplay adds further interest in the film and makes it a good watch.

The story is about the conflict between two protagonists, Allari Naresh and Rajiv Kanakala. Kanakala is a young doctor who lives with his father Kota Sreenivasa Rao. Kota is an alcoholic and he creates nuisance every day and this puts Rajiv in an embarrassing position. But he loves his father a lot.

One day, his father is admitted in a hospital following an accident and he dies shortly thereafter. Rajiv learns that his father has not died of injuries but due to wrong medication.

Who did it and why. Enter Allari Naresh, a young married guy, who is also a cold-blooded murderer. The psychopathic Naresh tells Rajiv that it is he who has killed his father as per the agreement made in the train. Naresh now wants Rajiv to keep his side of promise and kill Naresh’s wife Preethi Jingiani.

What is the agreement and why Naresh forces Rajiv to kill his wife? What is it that forces Rajiv Kanakala to agree to kill Preethi Jingiani? These are the suspense elements and must be watched on the screen.

Performance:

Rajiv Kanakala and Allari Naresh literally compete with each other fiercely to come up with a better performance than the other. Rajiv Kanakala comes into his won with his film and does a neat job. He dominates the screen for a major part of the first half.

Allari Naresh has done an excellent job as a young and calculating cold-blooded psychopath who can go to any extent to achieve his objective. Kota excels in his brief role particularly in the scene where he is on a hospital bed after the accident.

Preethi Jingiani is okay. Ali as a sub-inspector promises to do something big. But his role is suddenly chopped when the CI sends him away on one-year leave. The rest of the star cast also does a neat job.

Music is fine and Chandrashekar Yeleti’s gripping screenplay is a big asset. Vara Mullapudi has done a deft job with his direction. The film is sure to establish Vara Mullapudi as a promising director.

The film runs in a very interesting fashion and the fast half is very racy. It is as if we are hardly half an hour into the film but it is already intermission. Such is the effect of good screenplay.

The film drags just a bit in the second half and a song obstructs the pace of the film. But the film never bores you at any point of time, even for a second.


End Credits:

Starring:Rajiv Kanakala, Allari Naresh, Kota, Preeti Jingiani, Ali and others

Director: Vara Mullapudi

Music: Rajiv Kurakula

Release date: 08/02/2008




Labels: , , ,

"SUNDARA KANADA" Movie Review

K Vishwanath, K Balachander, Bapu..these masters made some memorable movies and classics in the past but their recent offerings bring blemish to their illustrious career. Bapu's latest Sundarakanda is no exception. No one can associate with this old-fashioned movie that told in boorish manner. Bapu and his famous jodi Ramana writer seem to have stuck still in the 70's. A jamindar marries a poor girl without the knowledge of his royal parents and the poor girl is thrown out of their home with a blame put on her. She raises her child far from the royal family. And the child takes on mission to reunite her separated parents with her own tricks.

No, we are not telling the story of Bapu - Ramana's classic Mutyala Muggu. Sundarakanda's basic story is similar to that one. The only difference is that the kid here is a full-grown woman called Pinky (Charmee) and it is not entertaining like the original masterpiece.

Sundarakanda is completely out of the sync with the current times. The story, the narration and the language that the characters speak are archaic. From scene one, it lags on and moves on with outdated screenplay.

Charmee in the role of Pinky Without A Tail and Penki Pilla has done full justice to her role but her character is uninteresting. Prema as Charmee's mother doesn't like look a mom to a 18 year old girl. Nor does the director take any effort to show difference to young Prema and when she turns mother.

Allari Naresh plays a journalist who rides on bicycle with a camera on his shoulder and takes photographs. His character is enough to show how old-fashioned the film is. Kota is the only saving grace. Music by Vidyasagar is nothing to rave about. photography by KRK Raju is neat, though. A shot where decreasing of shadow to depict the time passed till the dusk is quite interesting. Background score (not done by Vidyasagar) is good.

Bottom-line

Anyone who respect for Bapu - Ramana, for their great earlier movies, feel disappointed with this old-fashioned flick. Quite boring!

End Cedits:

Starring:Charmee, Naresh, Prema, Suneel Sharma, Ranganath, Sangeeta, Kota Srinivasa Rao and others
Story, screenplay, and dialogues: Mullapudi Ramana
Cinematography: KRK Raju
Music: Vidyasagar
Co-producer: Bhanu Prakash Reddy
Producer: K Aparna
Directed by: Bapu
Release date: Feb 08, 2008
CBFC Rating: U

Labels: , , , , , , ,

"KRISHNARJUNA" Movie Review


Krishnarjuna was rumored to have been inspired from Bruce Almighty starring Jim Carrey. But the movie contains just one idea, if that, from the Hollywood production including the styling of God played by Morgan Freeman (and Nagarjuna in this). For those who watched the original and expected humor, entertainment and a subtle message in it will be disappointed. For those who saw the posters and expected humor, entertainment and Nag-Vishnu combo to rock will be totally disappointed.

Mamta Mohandas and VishnuPlot Arjuna is born in a temple with his mother succumbing in labor. The villagers believe that to be impure so they close the temple. He and his grandmother serve a family and make a living. His job is to look after Satya, the college-going arrogant sister of his employer. She gets a suitor, Prem, but an astrologer reads her birth-charts and predicts doom for her husband. So Arjun is made the scapegoat and is wedded to Satya. There is no bliss, in contrast, the family harasses him so that he dies and Satya can marry Prem without a glitch. When his grandmother dies unable to tolerate the situation, he tries to follow her. But God intervenes.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The cool quotient generated by God in a dashing white suit is all lost because of the predominance of superstition in the movie. The slow first half is justified if the second half, after Nagarjuna's entry, had been any better. Unfortunately it's not. The introduction scene of Nagarjuna is the similar to Morgan Freeman in the original, but that's where the similarity ends. But instead of going uphill from there, the narration falls flat.

Most of the first half is spent in showing the harassment that Arjun and his grandmother tolerate from Satya's family. A little vulgar 'humor' comes in the form of Brahmanandam, who plays an astrologer and his voluptuous wife. Go figure. Then we have Mamta Mohandas with a haughty expression wearing corsets and mini-skirts in some town/village (why???). Her teeth-gritting suitor and that whole track trying to open the temple door just drags.

The scenes showing Arjun's unwavering dedication to Satya's family and the sentiment in scenes featuring Manorama works. Nagarjuna's appearance and Mohanbabu as a Fakir are impressive. Other than that, the direction and script are weak, and so are the performances as a consequence.

Nagarjuna and VishnuPerformances Vishnu looks the part, but the emotional scenes lack conviction. He could do with a NTR-worthy makeover. The charm that one saw in Dhee is totally missing, and so is the energy level. Nagarjuna perks up the movie a little bit, stopping it from going completely downhill. But his scenes could have been executed so much better. Still, he makes a good God. Mamta Mohandas sings well and has a good figure. Acting skills are so-so. Manorama is convincing, as is Mohan Babu's cameo.

Song and Dance 'Buggalerrabadda' and 'Yamaranju Meeda' stand out in an otherwise disappointing compilation by Keeravani. Ditto with the picturization.

Last Word Disappointing direction from P. Vasu. All major aesthetic and commercial elements, from narration, performances, music, romance and humor suffer as a result. The saving grace if any is Nagarjuna's role, two tracks and a little of the sentiment and faith in the other protagonist's character which works to an extent.

End Credits:
Starring:
Nagarjuna, Vishnu, Mamta Mohandas, Manorama, Nasser, Prema, Brahmanandam, Bhuvaneswari, Suneel, Tanikella Bharani, Venumadhav, MS Narayana, Lakshmipathi, Vamsee, Srinivasa Reddy

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

"MR.MEDHAVI" Movie Review

Mister Medhavi has traces of his earlier movie, Sada Mee Sevalo, but just traces of it though. The plus points of the movie: humor, dialogues, characters. Minus points: pace, mediocre music, routine story.

Raja and GeneliaPlot Vishwak Sena is named, educated and brought up by his village primary school teacher (Tanikella Bharani) as he is orphaned at an early age. Swetha comes to his village from Canada as her grandmother is sick, and goes to the school for a while there. Vishwak falls in love with her. They become friends but she soon goes back to Canada. After an MBA degree Vishwak joins a company. He meets Swetha again as she is his employer's daughter. But Vishwak is now a calculative person, who believes life runs on these very calculations. He plans to make Swetha fall in love with him, but fate seems to have other plans as Siddhartha comes into their lives.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The narrative is definitely interesting in the movie. It seems like a risk, a make or break thing. But it works for the movie. Neelakanta's movies have a real life touch to it, that's both realistic yet magical. He doesn't try anything different, which sometimes is a good thing. He's good with some aspects, like characters and narrative. A HR who's passion is theatre (MS Narayana wearing drama company greasepaint and Krishna costume-a riot), a 'Gandhian' who doesn't practice what he preaches (Brahmanandam) and Vishwak Sena himself. Reminds you of the late Jandhyala or even Bapu sometimes, as far as character portraitures are concerned.

The pace of each scene is deliberately slow, because real life is not a blur of fast moving objects. But with the average attention span decreased due to obvious reasons, it gets difficult to stay alert in some parts of the movie. Basically, the grip slackens. The songs are again a drag, except one.

A small chunk of the movie contains Raja speaking directly to the camera, and the childhood love story between Raja and Genelia. The office gossip and atmosphere is bad. The various characters in the office, and even Sonu Sood's entry is not so good.

Performances Raja suits the character of Vishwak Sena, and he is expressive even as he is subtle. The energy level is down though, and surprisingly, even Genelia has downplayed her character for once. Funnily enough, the young Swetha has an accent while the grown-up Swetha has no trace of an accent. Suman as an entrepreneur shines in one scene where Siddhartha asks his employees to list out his bad qualities. Sonu Sood as Siddhartha, true to his name is slightly lofty yet likeable character and Sood does a convincing act. MS Narayana is really amusing as is Dharmavarapu. Tanikella Bharani justifies his role.

GeneliaMusic and Dance Boring songs, picturization including. The background is good in places.

Last Word The first half is not good as compared to secon half, the humor element is ever-present and its light entertainment throughout that has believable characters. The second half aof the movie is little bit better than first half how ever the whole movie is draaaaaaaaaaaging. No go for the front-benchers. and back benchers

End Credits:
Starring:
Raja, Genelia, Suman, Hema, Sonu Sood, Brahmanandam, MS Narayana, Dharmavarapu, Suman Setty, Tannikella Bharani and Others.
Art: KV Ramana.
Cinematography: Suneel K. Reddy.
Editing: V. Nagi Reddy.
Lyrics: Kandikonda.
Music: Chakri.
Story, Screenplay, Dialogues & Direction: Neelakanta.
Producer: Bodduluri Rama Rao.
Presenter: G. Madhusudhan Reddy.
Banner: Lifestyle Art Pictures.
Release Date: 26th January, 2008.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

"SWAGATAM" Movie Review

Swagatham is a slow and sentimental movie. Something that we expect from Dasaradh, the director, who had earlier given Santhosham starring Nagarjuna and possessing truckloads of sentimental value. Swagatham has touches of Kal Ho Na Ho in the first half, completely based in New York. The second half is again an old story, mostly with the flashback sequence and a hasty end. Not a minute too soon though.

Anushka, Jagapathi Babu and BhoomikaPlot Sailu lives in New York with her widowed mother and Chiku, her late sister’s son who she brings up as her own. Her former brother-in-law Srikanth is now married to another woman, her part-time job as an event manager is not going great guns and her boutique may close because of loses. KK sets up a textile shop opposite hers and moves in next door. He has a daughter and a past that not everyone knows. Sailu falls in love with him eventually, and the facts unfold.

Story, Screenplay and Direction Starting with Sailu and ending with KK, several of the characters in the first half in NY are all from Kal Ho Na Ho. Even Lillete Dubey’s character has been borrowed. Remember how SRK tries to teach Priety to smile etc etc…all kept intact in Swagatham. Just the disease is different, and it comes to a different person.

There is some humor in it, but lot of it just double entendres and some of it a big yawn. But Swagatham has it’s moments. Firstly, the direction and characters of the first half albeit copied. Even the style of introducing characters and the beginning resembles KHNH. The character of Jagapathi Babu, in the flashback is interesting, and he has done it well.

Dubbing has major lip sync problems in the first half. Only one song stands out, but otherwise the music is nothing to speak of.

Performances Jagapathi Babu does a good job, but somehow he’s wasted in this inspired first half. As a disciplined businessman with obvious obsessive compulsiveness, he is convincing. Bhoomika shares a good chemistry with Jagapathi Babu. Anushka thankfully gets a role where she doesn’t have to look silly and prance around (Don, Okka Magaadu), so she’s okay. Arjun has done his own dubbing, and suits the cameo he plays. Dharmavarapu, MS Narayana, Sharath Babu are cast in roles ‘meant’ for them again. Ravi Babu was better off in Anasuya.

Jagapathi BabuMusic and Dance The music is bland. You understand how the movie is going to be when the titles come on and it says ‘Swaaagatham….’ a couple of times with female chorus in the background. Not bad, but a bit of a drag.

Last Word Old story. Old bottle. Actually the most touching moment is after the end of the movie, Jagapathi Babu thanks Arjun for taking time and being in the movie and always being there for him ‘Arjuna’. Now that’s touching.

End Cedits:

Staring:
Jagapati Babu, Arjun, Bhumika Chawla, Anushka, Sarath Babu, Dharmavarapu, Ravi Babu, Kondavalasa, Mallikharjuna Rao, MS Narayana, Radha Kumari, Rama Prabha, Jhansi and Others.
Cinematography: Ramesh Babu.
Editing: MR Varma.
Music: RP Patnaik.
Screenplay: Gopi Mohan.
Story, Dialogues & Direction: Dasarath.
Producer: Adityaram.
Banner: Adityaram Movies.
Release Date: 25th January, 2008.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

"VAANA" Movie Review

MS Raju decided to play safe in his directorial debut, but unfortunately this remake of the Kannada super hit Mungaru Male seems to have been lost in translation. It's not a bad movie, but after a smooth first half, the second half draaaaaaaaggggggs. And that's putting it mildly.

Meera Chopra and VinayPlot Abhi falls in love with a girl at first site. He goes to Anantagiri with his mother, to her old friend's house. And that girl turns out to be Nandini, who is engaged to be married. Initially, Nandini is irritated by Abhi, but slowly a friendship develops. But the wedding is coming up, and there seems nothing the duo can do about it.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The first half goes at a medium pace, and with a little humor and a love story shaping up, it is interesting enough. The movie goes downhill in the second half, and in those picturesque areas with natural rain and beautiful photography, the direction suffers. The production values are immaculate, but there's no use.

Abhi picks up a rabbit somewhere, names it Devadas. That's in the first half, and the poor little Bunny is harmless then. In the second half though, the presence of the rabbit becomes intolerable. Not it's fault of course. It somehow turns into the protagonist in the second half. There's a sub-plot involving Ajay, who plays a villainous entity who likes Nandini, in trademark violent fashion. That goes nowhere unfortunately.

In Kannada, the movie might have clicked, but it depends on a lot of other factors. Vaana has no substance in it in the first place, which is surprising considering MS Raju's track record. The message is crystal clear, but what's the point if the movie puts you to sleep before you figure out the message? Not happening.

Performances Vinay is cast well for the role, and though a little stiff at times, he shows promise. It is completely wasted, because the dialogues in the climax belong to 1948, whereas the dude's from here and now. Meera Chopra is okay, but shares no chemistry with Vinay even when she has to. Naresh does a good job in a brief role. Jayasudha justifies her role. Suman as a retired army officer and Seetha as his wife are convincing.

Vinay and Meera ChopraMusic and Dance The picturization of the songs, and the music itself is nice and used well.

Last Word It's a very average movie, and the beautiful message could have been etched out in a touching manner. It touches the patience nerve a good deal, but doesn't reach anywhere near the heart. Disappointing fare from MS Raju with a promising first half and a drag post-break.

End Credits:
Starring: Vinay, Meera Chopra, Suman, Seetha, Naresh, Jayasudha, Dharmavarapu, Paruchuri Gopalakrishna, Ajay, MS Narayana and Others.
Art: Rajeev.
Cinematography: Sekhar V. Joseph.
Dialogues: Paruchuri Brothers.
Editing: KV Krishna Reddy.
Lyrics: Sirivennela.
Music: Kamalakar.
Screenplay, Producer & Direction: MS Raju.
Banner: Sumanth Art Productions-SPR Entertainments India Pvt. Ltd.
Release Date: 15th January, 2008.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by Digidreams