Friday, 21 December, 2007

"Mantra" Movie Review


Osho' Tulasiram is the debutant director of Mantra. Why he calls himself Osho is not important; whether Mantra lived up to its expectations is the vital point. Mantra has all the elements of a thriller, and even components of a supernatural thriller. Sudden loud noises, background score that picks up the volume as the camera approaches it's target, a supposedly haunted house amongst other things. Logically, there some loose ends to the subplots. But Mantra does thrill, though it does not scare (which might not be the target, to be fair). It thrills not because of the loud noises or the dark shadows, but because you keep guessing and end up at red herrings.

CharmmePlot Mantra is the orphaned owner of Mantra Nilayam, which she wants to sell in order to pay off her father's debts. The previous owners of the farmhouse have died under mysterious circumstances, and there is a rumor that the house is haunted. A potential buyer sets a condition-to get someone to stay there for a while before he buys it. Hero comes to threaten Mantra to pay up her debts, and when he gets wind of the situation, he offers to stay there for a commission. He and his friends go there, but the sinister mood prevails.

Movie It's difficult to make a thriller without people pointing out logic bloopers every second scene. Overall, the suspense is well-maintained. The camerawork is good, especially in the tricky night sequences. The dialogues are crisp and to the point, with Shivaji and co. bagging the comic lines. Editing by debutant Upendra is good, as essential as the direction in a suspense flick. The movie runs into a cliché with those sudden sounds, dark shadows and the works. The movie is technically satisfactory, and the narration is gripping in parts. Charmme and Shivaji dominate the screen time. Along with them, Chitram Seenu as a brave sort and Vijay as a cowardly character give convincing performances. Jeeva has good timing with Shivaji.


1. First half has all the elements of a good thriller. There is ample suspense, a sprinkling of humor, character establishment (the protagonists).
2. The four guys staying at the house is done well. The foursome did a good job too, and has well written characters.
3. Charmme's work in a couple of the scenes, both in the first half and the climax is very good.
4. In the first half, Chitram Seenu's character spruce up the goings-on while with Jeeva's entry, the second half picks up pace. There is a scene where Charmme and Jeeva mistake each other for a ghost-that scene could have been more comic though.
5. Shivaji actually gets more screen time, and has a tailor-made character. A little more energy and a bit of grooming, and this outsider can actually go places.

Fishy Four
1. Hero calls Manikyam to a Pan Dabba in the middle of the night, but he provides him some info and leaves. He called him for that??
2. Mantra sitting in the swimming pool and talking to Hero-that sequence looks silly and unconvincing.
3. There seems to be absolutely no police inquiry into the deaths of the inmates of the house.
4. Munu Swami's track has several bloopers. No one frames a photograph with a third person with a couple, as is found in the house. The connection between them is established for nothing.

CharmmeMusic The background and camera work together to scare, and succeed very little. The first half has a reasonably decent score starting from the titles, while somebody turned up the volume in the second half. The songs-'Oohallona' is hummable. 'Maha' is of course a direct lift from 'My Humps' (and if the Black Eyed Peas ever get wind of their Telugu version..) and a drums instrumental in the second half is lifted from James Asher's 'Feet In The Soil'.

Last Word To pick such a genre for a debut, one needs G.U.T.S. Osho T obviously has that, and is someone to watch out for. He and his team have given a decent first flick, and the feel of the thriller has been brought out well. No great shakes, with a slightly disappointing second half followed by a insipid climax, but a good one-time watch nonetheless. This Mantra works moderately.

End Credits:
Starring:
Shivaji, Charmi, Kousha, Chitram Srinu, Jeeva, Vijay and Others.
Art: DY Satyanarayana.
Cinematography: Sivendra.
Editing: Upendra.
Music: Anand.
Story & Screenplay: Ravi Prakash.
Direction: Tulasiram.
Producer: Kalyanram.
Co-Producer: Uma Prakash.
Presenter: Ravi Prakash.
Nirmana Saradhyam: Soma Vijaya Prakash.
Banner: Gen'next Movies.
Release Date: 14th December, 2007.

Labels: , ,

"Anasuya" Movie Review



Anasuya is the story of a journalist whose life takes a u-turn when a psychopath killer enters her life. The movie has a gripping screenplay with a few minor glitches. It makes an interesting one-time watch, and has focused on being as subtle as possible. It's not the run-of-the-mill story. It is a very 'Indian' storyline and even if the plot and characterization is old news, it's done well and the narrative keeps up the attention levels.

BhoomikaPlot Anasuya is a journalist majoring in criminal psychology. She is an investigative journalist for a news channel and lives with an acquaintance and a little girl called Lakshmi she saves from being a harassed domestic help. Anand is a task force officer in a team leading the investigation of a murder trail. The murderer kills the victim, takes a random part of their body and leaves a rose next to their body. Tragedy strikes Anasuya when the 'uncle' that she is staying with gets murdered and she spots the killer. She gets involved in the case closely and gets to the bottom of it.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The story is that of an unstable man and once the man is identified, it ceases to be a mystery. After that, holding the viewers attention is difficult. Ravibabu's screenplay does just that. The first half keeps the interest level alive alright and the curiosity is on a high. Instead of pulling in unnecessary subplots, the maker gets straight to the point. The second half is interesting and that saves the movie, because in a movie like this, it's the second half that makes all the difference.

To give the director credit, it doesn't have too many shrieks and sounds. The background is not overpowering, and only has the occasional creaking and dark alleys and sudden loud noises. But these are not out-of-place or just to scare or thrill. Except for the fact that the first half has many houses and places kept in dark (why doesn't anyone switch on the lights?). Bhoomika is an asset to the movie, with a convincing performance and subtlety in her whole aspect. From the beginning, it's a clear-cut murder trail and nothing else.

The madness of the man is shown, but not explained-why, how or when is neglected, and just what it is, is shown. There are some very gruesome shots, bodies with parts missing and other such things that don't go well with popcorn.

Glitches: When the body comes out of the concrete mixer in an unrecognizable state, the clothes are intact and the glasses are only slightly broken-but this apparently doesn't rouse the suspicion of the police. The police also never try to establish a motive, and the task force is shown rounding up a place he's suspected to be inside.

Bhoomika and AbbasPerformances Bhoomika is very good, expressive without being over-the-top. There are not many dialogues, and the little kid has fewer still, and has given a convincing performance. Abbas justifies his role, so has Sameer as a jealous newsreader. Ravibabu has done his best yet, stealing the limelight in the second half. Nikitha and her friend, Bhoomika's reporter friend and Shankar Melkote do well in their brief roles.

Music and Dance There is one mandatory item number, which is just okay. Then there's a song that shows the bonding between Bhoomika and the little girl, Lakshmi.

Last Word You know those coincidences that a murder trail must contain to propel the story? Like the protagonist's kin turn out to be victims, the moment she learns where the murderer will head next is when he heads there and other such details? That happens a few times in the second half, and for those who get nausea on seeing the insides of a person might not appreciate some sequences. After all, its about a cold-blooded murderer. But the movie is interesting, the pace is good and the plot is gripping.

End Credits:
Starring:
Bhoomika, Abbas, Nikitha, Neha Sarath, Sameer, Harshavardhan, Shankar Melkote, Ankitha, Krishna Mohan, Revathi, Prema, Mallesh and Others.
Action: Kanal Kannan.
Cinematography: N. Sudhakar Reddy.
DTS Mixing: Madhusudan Reddy.
Editing: Marthand K. Venkatesh.
Lyrics: Bhaskarabhatla.
Music: Sekhar Chandra.
Screenplay: Paruchuri Brothers.
Producer & Direction: Ravibabu.
Presenter: Suresh Productions.
Banner: Flying Frogs.
Release Date: 21st December, 2007.

Labels: , , ,

"Don" Movie Review


Don has Nagarjuna as a do-gooder, wearing stylish clothes and living a flamboyant hi-tech lifestyle. It has some stylized action sequences and about three good scenes (including dialogues). And that's about it. Don has an average first half, with a hyped entry scene and some video game fights. The second half goes downhill with absolutely no consistency. Raghava Lawrence is the director, choreographer and has additional credits for music, story and screenplay and is also the Don's right-hand man, taking up as much space as the Don.

NagarjunaPlot Suri is influential and powerful in the state, and people know him as Don. He isn't a mafia don; on the contrary, he lives to see that justice is served and that 'his' people are happy. Stephen is a Mafia king who's taken over most of the country, and now he wants Andhra Pradesh under his control. Don refuses to let Stephen gain any power over his state and the war between the two Dons, the good one and the evil one begins.

What's Good Suri/Don's entry scene, with the street children now grown-up into big 'Boys' wearing leather jackets and looking like they belong to Italian Mafia. The scene where Stephen and Suri meet for the first time, that's the one before the break. The song 'Dada Puttistha' is good, but the timing is totally wrong-it dilutes the entire situation and the movie fails to pick up after that.

What's Not The screenplay and the inconsistency of the protagonist. Don's character is not clearly defined, what his 'business' is and how come a do-gooder spends such huge amounts on his lavish lifestyle. His background is a huge secret in the beginning, which Stephen mentions without any significance later on. The second half has been ruined because of several factors-bomb blasts and songs cropping up at the worst possible moment being two worth mentioning. Don challenges Stephen that he will drive him insane, but does nothing of that sort. Stephen remains cool and collected till the end. Long drawn chases, Raghava Lawrence grabbing any amount of limelight he can get and an illogical climax sequence sums up the second half.

Anushka acts like she's in a school play and Nikitha hams too. The two girls hardly have any role to play, except as romantic interests and all the scenes with them are badly scripted with bleak humor. Coming to the humor part, those who watch Cineranjani reruns and laugh uncontrollably seeing the same comedy scene for the 100th time are the only ones who'll find the supposed comic bits funny. The rest will smirk painfully or grin at rare moments. Only a dialogue or two tickles the funny bone. Raghava attempts at some humor through his character, but it's very repetitive.

Anushka and NagarjunaPerformances Nagarjuna is stylish, no doubt about that. He carries off all that leather and those trendy boots perfectly. But he looks tired, he remains stiff in the little dance he involves himself in and he and Anuskha have no chemistry. In fact, he and Raghava seem to have better timing than the lead pair. Acting-wise, he doesn't flaw but its not his best either. Raghava Lawrence: When it was just choreography or just acting (Style), he did a decent job. Now, with all his fingers in all the pies, he can't concentrate on any one department. He hams, simple. He also, as the director, makes Anushka and Nikitha ham. Jeeva is okay, while Chalapathi Rao's character is confusing-which father dances with joy seeing his daughter in someone's arms?

Kelly Dorjee looks the part-Stephen, a Mafia Don. Cool is the word, with his white outfit contrasting Nagarjuna's black one. The makeup, white hair and beard, is done well. Acting-wise, not bad; ditto goes for Chetan Hansraj, better known for his roles on Hindi soaps. Nasser in a brief role has good presence.

Music and Dance The first song 'Su Su Suriyana' and the last one 'Dada Puttistha' are okay. The rest of the songs are bad, the picturization is boring and the choreography is not exciting. The background music could have been better; the first half is okay, in the second half it gets too loud.

Last Word Don has a good title, fashionable outfits, lots of leather, three good scenes, two tolerable songs and some video game action. Oh, and it stars Nagarjuna and Raghava Lawrence. Sounds interesting? No? Well, Manchivallaku Suri and Chaddavallaku Don (the oft-repeated dialogue in the flick). And we all know most of the population is good and they might not prefer this Don.

End Credits:
Starring:
Nagarjuna, Lawrence, Anushka, Nikitha, Kelly Dorjee, Chalapathi Rao, Jeeva, Chetan Hansraj, Nasser and Others.
Action: Vijay.
Art: Ashok Kumar.
Cinematography: S. Gopal Reddy.
Dialogues: Abburi Ravi.
Editing: Marthand K. Venkatesh.
Story, Screenplay, Music, Choreography & Direction: Raghavendra Lawrence.
Producer: ML Kumar Chowdary.
Banner: Sri Keerthi Creations.
Release Date: 20th December, 2007.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, 8 December, 2007

"GODAVA" Movie Review



For someone who has made several movies before, including 20 movies with Chiranjeevi, his son's debut venture comes as a disappointment. Kodanda Rami Reddy's Godava starring his son Vaibhav and newcomer/Zee Cinestar runner-up Shraddha Arya seems like a mishmash of recent hits, including Hindi trendsetter Dil Chahta Hai. As for Vaibhav, he shows some spark, with a style of his own already, but shows obvious traces of Pawan Kalyan and Ravi Teja. Even Harivarun of tried to act like these stars, but that was a total dud. Vaibhav, on the other hand, is both confident and gives it his all in a weak script and an old screenplay.

Vaibhav and Shraddha AryaPlot Balu's parents have had a love marriage but fight incessantly. This has put him off love, and he doesn't believe in it. After a series of spats with Anjali, he helps her out saving her honor, after which she falls in love with him. Her father fixes her wedding to a super rich guy, but Anjali's problem is more than that. She has to first make Balu believe in love before attempting to have him reciprocate her feelings.

Story, Screenplay and Direction You look for one major 'Godava' or several small but interesting Godavas. Nope. The concept is old news, and the title has little to do with it in reality. The character of Balu is based on Aamir Khan's character in Dil Chahta Hai, and even the Opera scene with Priety Zinta has been used. The script lacks clarity and the love story totally lacks conviction.

As for the comedy, there is one half-baked track with Venumadhav that is overdone. Suneel steps in and leaves without evoking a smile, and the situational comedy is just okay. That is to say that in the second half everything goes for a toss. The first half keeps the interest level up, because we still wait for the Godava, we still wait to see where it's all leading to. The character is established, his conflict is clear, but everything else is blurry. Editing and dubbing are flawed, with jerky scene endings and imperfect lip sync.

Anjali's habit of pinching people borders on perversion. As opposed to Balu, Anjali's character has not been dealt with properly. But she more than makes up for it, with her skimpy clothes and oozing sex appeal in the songs.

Sajayi Shinde and VaibhavPerformances Vaibhav is impressive mainly because it's his debut, and he performs very confidently for a debutant. It will take a movie or two more to see if he's someone to actually watch out for. Right now he has done justice to the role of Balu. Shraddha Arya is pretty and poised. Sayaji Shinde, Jayaprakash Reddy and Annapurna as Shradha's father and grandparents respectively have given a repeat performance. So has the whole gang of friends that the lead pair shares.

Song and Dance Two songs are catchy, and the picturizations are watchable, especially the ones in the first half. Mumait's sister is good too, Zubein Khan shows that it's all in the family. But she obviously has only part of Mumait's oomph.

Last Word Godava is not a bad movie. It's a movie that has unfortunately borrowed from all good Telugu and Hindi movies and the mix and match result is inevitably boring. The first half is the saving grace, but the second half is beyond redemption. Godava is definitely not one of this year's better releases, but Vaibhav has given a decent debut considering he held his own in a script too shoddy for words.

End credits:
Starring:
Vaibhav, Sharaddha Arya, Sayaji Shinde, Nataraj, Chalapati Rao, Delhi Rajeswari, Babloo, Chitram Srinu, Jayaprakash Reddy, Brahmanandam, Venumadhav, AVS, Nagababu, Suneel, Raghubabu, Uttej, Annapurna, Subhashini and Others.
Art: JK Murthy.
Cinematography: Dinesh.
Dialogues: Paruchuri Brothers.
Editing: Marthand K. Venkatesh.
Music: Mani Sharma.
Direction: A. Kodanda Rami Reddy.
Producer: A. Bharati.
Presenter: A. Suneel Reddy.
Banner: K Films.
Release Date: 7th December, 2007.

Labels: , , , ,

Powered by Digidreams