Friday, 23 November, 2007

"TAKKARI" Movie Review



First things first. Takkari is a better movie than Amma Rajashekar's previous venture, Khatarnak. It is an old rich girl-poor boy format, predominantly a love story and a tit-for-tat rivalry between the girl's lover and brother (similar to the director's debut Ranam). The first half is good, and fortunately this time the second half is strong too. Nitin and Sada make a good pair, cast again after their combined debut in Jayam and look totally glam. The music is not bad, while the dialogue delivery, lip sync and background score could have been better.

Nitin and SadaPlot Tirupathi wants to start a business, but his father won't give him any money to invest. He falls in love with Priya, who is business magnate Guru's highly protected sister. Guru strikes a bargain with Tirupathi-leave his sister in return for money. Tirupathi agrees, and what happens to this love story is the rest of the movie.

Story, Screenplay and Direction So Tirupathi agrees to take the money. That is partly surprising, but then it becomes predictable. To give the movie due credit, even if it is predictable, it remains entertaining. The direction and Nitin's performance improve as the movie picks up pace. Two songs, and Nitin's highly rehearsed steps and Sada's makeover is good.

Outsmarting the opponent is a really old theme, and all the tricks and gimmicks have been done to death. Yet Takkari retains some amount of freshness and it turns out to be a good youthful love story in spite of itself. Editing, dubbing and re-recording in the second half is not up to the mark. The beginning is shoddy. While striking the bargain, Nitin's dialogues are long and dragged unnecessarily.

Some interesting scenes are: when Tirupathi sells his father's land to Guru for a huge profit, Ali's role as a petty thief, when Priya finally returns Tirupathi's love, the scene where Tirupathi and Guru strike the bargain and the IT raid scene. Basically, these are the scenes which glue the movie together and make it worth watching.

Nitin and SadaPerformances Nitin has gotten rid of his chocolate boy looks, and the makeover is good but not complete. Performance-wise, the director has extracted only some of his potential and he gives a repeat performance after Dil (which has a similar theme again). Skinny Sada shows a lot of skin, wears super glam outfits and pouts prettily. Sayaji Shinde is good and the timing Nitin and Shinde have together is good. Raghubabu as Shinde's secretary and Satyam Rajesh and others as Nitin's friends have been cast right.

Music and Dance The songs are really loud and all of them are fast-paced dance numbers.

Last Word It's an enjoyable movie, with Nitin outsmarting Sayaji instead of Prakashraj this time. It has some new ideas and that adds freshness to an old theme.

End Credits
Starring:
Nitin, Sada, Sayaji Shinde, Chandramohan, Sudha, Raghubabu, Satyam Rajesh, Ali, Venumadhav and Others.
Action: 'Gilli' Sekhar.
Art: AS Prakash.
Cinematography: Santosh RSV.
Dialogues: Marudhuri Raja.
Editing: Goutham Raju.
Music: Chakri.
Story, Screenplay & Direction: Amma Rajashekar.
Producer: Paruchuri Sivarama Prasad.
Presenter: Paruchuri Kireeti.
Banner: United Movies.
Release Date: 23rd November, 2007.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Monday, 12 November, 2007

"NAVA VASANTHAM" Movie Review



Navavasantham is the remake of the Tamil movie Punnagai Desam, also starring Tarun. It's a simple story, an old story and even the treatment is old. That being said, it is still watchable. Four friends from a village, struggling to make a mark in the city away from their parents. Sounds familiar? Of course, there have been so many movies with such a theme. Navavasantham has a straightforward narrative, and moves quickly.

Suneel, Akash, Tarun and RohitPlot Vijay (Suneel) wants to be a mimicry artiste, Prasad (Akash) is studying for IAS and Rohit wants to make it as a singer. All of them are living together in a room when Ganesh (Tarun) joins them. Ganesh comes to the city from the same village looking for his uncle and her daughter 'Ammu' whom he was to marry. His uncle's rejection disheartens him and he leaves without looking at his now grown-up Ammu. Meanwhile, he works hard to make money to fulfill his friends' dreams. He also makes other friends-Anjali (Priyamani) and Ankita. Anjali is in fact his very own Ammu but he doesn't know it. He and his friends work hard to reach their goals, and Ganesh selflessly helps them. How they become successful and whether or not he gets his love is the rest of the plot.

Story, Screenplay and Direction So the plot is old as time. As for the treatment, it is full of sad old humor courtesy Suneel, one selfless friend and the realization of dreams. The music is easy on the ears, nothing exceptional. You know one of those old B&W movies that are telecast during the weekdays in the afternoons (non-prime time)? But simple, uncomplicated plots that people doing all their chores can follow throughout-that's Navavasantham.

A story that's been done before, but with a new cast. Suneel and Tarun hold the show, in that order. It's a comeback vehicle for three of the main cast, i.e. all except Suneel. One thing that could have been avoided, or at least toned down, is the speeches. One long righteous speech after another gets a little too tedious. The two female leads are not given much screen time, but Priyamani still manages to hold her own in her brief role. Navavasantham is one more movie about friendship that has released this year, and has an old-school treatment. It has its touching moments, and although clichéd, still moves you.

Priyamani and AnkitaPerformances Suneel's 'mimicry' is not convincing, because it has been obviously dubbed and not his own. But he still manages to hold the plot along with Tarun. Tarun arrived with a bang, like a rocket-but fizzled out exactly the same way. In no way is he any less talented than any of the other 'younger lot' but he needs good roles and characters. Akash remains stiff after his hiatus and Rohit suits his role and justifies his character. Priyamani stands out among the two female leads, stealing the show under Ankita's nose. Kota Srinivasa Rao does a good job portraying a cynic.

Music and Dance SA Rajkumar's music is just okay, with one melodious song. But it's quite forgettable.

Last Word Old school friendship story that has some touching moments. It's a decent and clean friendship flick, but drags during the climax. Watchable but not memorable. Like all other 'Supergood' movies, this movie is also technically mediocre including editing, photography and background score.

End Credits
Tarun, Akash, Rohit, Suneel, Priyamani, Ankita, Suneel, Ahuti Prasad, Brahmanandam, Kota Srinivasa Rao and Others.
Art: Kumar.
Cinematography: Sarvesh Murari.
Dialogues: Rajendra Kumar.
Editing: Nandamuri Hari.
Music: SA Rajkumar.
Story, Screenplay & Direction: Shahjahan.
Producer(s): NV Prasad & Paras Jain.
Presenter: RB Choudary.
Banner: Megaa Supergood Films Pvt. Ltd.
Release Date: 9th November, 2007.

Starring:

Labels: , , , , , ,

"OM SHANTI OM" Movie Review



Shah Rukh Khan, Shreyas Talpade and Deepika PadukoneReincarnation. The 70s Hindi film industry, with it's drama, the garish sets and costumes, the hamming, the romance and all the idiosyncrasies of that era. A junior artiste and his love for that era's 'Dreamy girl'. Cut to present. The rich, spoiled star son, a star himself, who suddenly remembers his past life. That's two Oms, and one Shanti for you. Om Shanti Om. Plus three complete 'Paisa Vasool' Songs. Total entertainment, and who cares if it's mindless.

Plot Again? OK. Om Prakash Makhija is a junior artiste of the 70s who falls in love with Shanti Priya, a leading lady. The doomed love story ends with the death of Om, where he is taken to a hospital by a lead actor Rajesh Kapoor. His son is born at the same time as Om's death; also named Om, this Om Kapoor turns into a super star. But his life changes when he remembers his past life.

Story, Screenplay and Direction Farah Khan, Shah Rukh Khan and the rest of those involved in the scripting and production of Om Shanti Om are all children of the 70s. That was the time they had The Time of their lives, even if they were not as famous or not as rich. So that era stayed with them, just how much is shown by the movie they made. Even Farah's 'Main Hoon Na' appeals to a lot of the audiences who started watching Hindi movies (and loving them) in the 70s. Fun, fights and colorful songs with heavy doses of the Ram-Laxman sentiment. Even her better-half Shirish Kunder's Jaan-e-mann is something on those lines.

Coming to that, Om Shanti Om starts off with a thoroughly enjoyable 'Om Shanti Om', with Rishi Kapoor dancing on the stage to the super hit song and Om Makhija in the crowd-a junior artiste with dreams of making it big. The whole crew in the movie is seen sometime or the other. It was basically a party, albeit with lot of hard work. Those who have seen Jaan-e-mann will remember even that movie starts off like that. With Salman Khan accepting a Filmfare and thanking Meena Kumari in the end. Clever editing., and likeable, especially for Hindi movie buffs.

The first half of the first half is a lot of fun and Technicolor dreams; then follows the broken hearts, crime and wasted lives. The second half is a revenge drama with two songs that get the maximum hoots of the year (Dard-e-Disco and Deewangi, of course). It is a treat for SRK fans, and the reverse is also true. It is 'Bollywood' celebrating itself.

Yes, there are 31 stars in the song. But there's more. From Manoj Kumar to Govinda, the movie applauds and laughs at the same time at many actors. The references are galore. The climax is very, very, very filmy; in fact, filmy to the power of Manmohan Desai whom Farah seems to revere. It's a total spectacle, from the shuru to the anth.

The art work and cinematography, some truly hilarious scenes and the sheer attitude with which the movie was made (no brains allowed) are what work for the movie. It's like all the reincarnation movies you've seen and it's nothing like all the reincarnation movies you've seen.

Deepika Padukone and Arjun RampalPerformances SRK enjoys himself. No other word for it. He has a great time, showing off all his skills, and I don't mean just acting. Everything-with a brand new six-pack abs, two different characters to play, and a lot to cry about. Plus, there's loads of music and dance. So he entertains, and how. Deepika Padukone does what is required of her, looks absolutely pretty and smiles to light up the set. Sheryas Talpade and Kirron Kher are very good in the first half, and their make-up cheats them in the second. It could have been better. Jawed Sheikh is rightly cast. Arjun Rampal does a good job (finally!).

Song and Dance Really good music from Vishal-Shekhar. The background by Sandeep Chowta is also good. Ajab Si, Dard-e-Disco, Om Shanti Om, Deewangi-actually, all the songs are good. The second half survives because of the music.

Last Word It's a movie made with a lot of love, and love for Hindi cinema as it is, however it is. That's what makes it so appealing to every Hindi movie aficionado and even the completely ridiculous moments are made up by the fab music, the pace and the fun element in the movie.

End Credits
Starring:Shah Rukh Khan, Arjun Rampal, Kirron Kher, Shreyas Talpade, Deepika Padukone, Bindu, Jawed Sheikh, Satish Shah, Nitish Pandey, Yuvika Chaudary, Shawar Ali, Asawari Joshi and Others.
Action: Shyam Kaushal, Aamar Shetty & Angelo Sahin.
Art: Sabu Cyril.
Background Music: Sandeep Chowta.
Costumes: Manish Malhotra, Karan Johar & Sanjiv Mulchandani.
Dialogues: Mayur Puri.
Director Of Photography: V. Manikandan.
Editing: Shirish Kunder.
Lyrics: Javed Akhtar.
Music: Vishal-Shekhar.
Re-Recordist: Kuldeep Sood.
Screenplay: Mushtaq Shiekh-Farah Khan.
Sound Designer: Nakul Kamte.
Choreography, Story & Director: Farah Khan.
Producer: Gauri Khan.
Executive Producer: Sanjiv Chawla.
Banner: Eros Entertainment-Red Chillies Entertainment.
Release Date: 9th November, 2007.
Starring:

Labels: , , ,

"SAAWARIYA" Movie Review



Sonam Kapoor and Ranbir KapoorSaawariya is based on Dostoevsky's short story 'White Nights' and is the launch pad of two star kids-Ranbir Raj Kapoor and Sonam Kapoor. Sanjay Leela Bhansali shows his technical expertise again, but little else. There are good things about Saawariya. The music, a good new find a.k.a. Ranbir and its short length. Yeah, that's about it.

Plot Ranbir Raj is a singer at a bar, staying as a paying guest in an area full of contrasting conservative households and a brothel. He meets Sakina on a bridge on night and falls in love with her. She is in love with Iman, an ex-tenant who leaves but promises to come back by Id. While Ranbir tries to win her love, Sakina waits and pines for her lover to fulfill his promise. The duo forms a friendship, but where it will lead is the rest of the plot.

Story, Screenplay and Direction It's set in a never-never land far-far away. Well, one could hazard a guess at some time before independence (because the coin shown has the Queen on it) and far north (because it snows). For all the authenticity and perfection that Bhansali reportedly insists on, Sakina, a Muslim girl of a conservative background wears cleavage showing and backless outfits. He can take the artistic freedom of not keeping the setting unreal, but just a question, why is it all blue after black?

The story itself is short, and has one of those unconventional endings. The best that Bhansali did was to keep the movie also short, instead of trying to drag a short story. It is a four day romance, and not always two-sided. The main characters all go through some conflict at some time and hence they could have had deeper character portraits. But they end up being flat, but it is to the director's discredit and not merely theirs.

As mentioned before, the cinematography is nothing like the previous movies they made together (Ravi K. Chandran and Bhansali)-the colorful HDDCS and the deep and dark Black. Here the art director (Omung Kumar) gets to play with all shades of blue, navy blue-black and grey; it is supposedly a 'fairy-tale' setting so we have loads of lights that flicker sadly. Oh and there's a lake, there's a brothel and a house with a piano where Ranbir stays. So neither impress. Nor do the dialogues, with references to the Kapoor legacy thrown in for good measure.

Bhansali's filmmaking style in Saawariya is of a maker who takes himself too seriously. If it's a niche movie and is meant to appeal to a small section of the audience, usually the budget does not exceed 5 crores and not 50 crores (as rumored). The pace is really slow, but the pace can be gentle yet gripping; alas, not for Saawariya, it doesn't.

Subtlety is something the movie lacks. And no, it's nothing like the over-the-top but enjoyable 'Moulin Rouge' either. The music sounds good, the movie lacks depth.

Salman KhanPerformances Ranbir Kapoor is very good for a first-timer. His voice, for some reason, sounds a little like Hrithik Roshan's and his laugh is like his inimitable father's. He dances well and performs with ease, but the director seemed to have asked for a lot of exuberance-which gets a little artificial at times. Sonam's role or character have not been worked on that much. It is limited and stifled, but she has ample grace and expressive eyes. Rani Mukherjee never disappoints. Salman Khan in a brief role suits his character. Zohra Segal is good.

Music and Dance The music is good in the movie, but a song crops up every now and then. The background is a little too loud, but barring that the music is a plus for the movie. Ranbir dances well. Sonam is graceful.

Last Word After all the hype and promotion, the movie is pretty average. The lead pair makes a good debut, and show some promise. They do not disappoint. This time, the director disappoints and his narrative skills let us down. It could have been a straightforward love story; but the focus is on the elaborate sets, eccentric lighting, usual melodrama with a little song and dance thrown in.

End Credits

Starring:
Ranbir Kapoor, Sonam Kapoor, Salman Khan, Rani Mukherjee, Zohra Sehgal, Begum Para and Others.
Art: Omung Kumar Bhandula-Vanita Omung Kumar.
Costumes: Anuradha-Reza Shariffi-Rajesh Pratap Singh.
Director Of Photography: Ravi K. Chandran.
Editing: Sanjay Leela Bhansali.
Lyrics: Sameer.
Music: Monty Sharma.
Screenplay: Prakash Kapadia-Sanjay Leela Bhansali.
Sound Designer: Resul Pookutty.
Producer & Director: Sanjay Leela Bhansali.
Executive Producers: Kuldeep Singh Rathore-Deepak Sharma.
Banner: SLB Films Pvt. Ltd.-SPE Films India Pvt. Ltd.
Release Date: 9th November, 2007.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, 1 November, 2007

"VIYYALA VARI KAYYALU" Movie Review



Viyyalavari Kayyalu stars Udaykiran, Neha Jhulka and Srihari. Udaykiran, after starting off his career with a bang, disappeared off the horizon in between. He reappeared of course, but the movies were few and all duds, including his last Abaddam. After Nuvvostanante Nenoddantana and Dhee, Srihari is cast in another prominent role, again as the female lead's brother. The plot is a revamp of so many other movies and there's nothing new in this one.

Neha Jhulka and SrihariPlot Nandini falls in love with Vamsi, a hair stylist, after he saves her from some eve-teasers. He rejects her but later falls for her when he sees how attached she is to her family. He stays with her family, consisting of her brother, sister-in-law and grandmother, trying to win her brother's approval. He is a leader in the Rayalseema district and people look up to him. Meanwhile, Vamsi's father is a 'resigned' justice-loving judge who spends two years selecting four girls for Vamsi. The two families seem impossible to convince, but how love wins them over is what the movie is about.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The story and the screenplay are the same old, same old. The direction is mediocre. The pace is really slow. The movie drags along, breaking into a song now and a fight in between. The way the love story between Vamsi and Nandini begins is juvenile. Srihari's character adds a new dimension to the story, and all other characters are overshadowed for a while.

So there's a couple in love. They want to convince their families and marry, and not against their will. So first the guy comes to the girl's place, trying to win her family over. Then it's the turn of the other potential viyyala varu. Does this sound familiar at all? Why, there have been umpteen movies with this theme. But forget similar plot lines in the hit Bommarillu or the dud Laila Majnu or any other movie. Viyyalavari Kayyalu borrows even scenes, like a scene or two totally reminiscent of Dilwale Dulhaniya Le Jayenge.

The pace is already slow, but to add to the misery there are some unnecessary scenes, which neither amuse nor add anything to the movie. Vamsi suddenly breaks into a song with four girls showing off their midriffs prominently; all of them potential brides, who finally tie him a rakhee and lecture his father. The entire movie is predictable, with only a few saving graces. The second half is slightly better than the first and the movie picks up pace before the climax.

Udaykiran and Neha JhulkaPerformances Srihari looks well-groomed, confident and has amazing screen presence. He is one actor who has shown tremendous improvement as a performer. From entering movies as a trained gymnast to showing his caliber as an artiste, he has come a long way.

Udaykiran too loses his erstwhile stammer and the raw dialogue rendering of say, Nuvvu Nenu. He gives a decent performance, but is overshadowed in the second half completely by Srihari, whose show it is thereon. He has become a little stiff though, and that shows when he dancing, and not in his performance.

Neha Jhulka sits pretty in the frame, but does nothing else. Kousalya makes a good pair with Srihari, dainty next to the dynamite. Shakuntala, Krishna Bhagwan, Jeeva, Narsing Yadav, Raghu Babu and Jayaprakash Reddy are cast in their stereotyped roles. Sayaji Shinde and Kavitha as Udaykiran's parents are okay and Venumadhav as his friend adds to the humor element in the movie.

Song and Dance The music is mediocre. The picturization and choreography do nothing to uplift it. But the song 'Suryude Sare Annade' stands out in the movie. The background in the first half is bad, while in the second half it picks up.

Last Word Viyyalavari Kayyalu lacks freshness and quality. It is like a nice fruit that has been kept for too long, and has therefore been spoiled. The director, music composer and the prominent cast have all worked in better movies before, and this comes as a disappointment.

End Credits

Starring:
Srihari, Udaykiran, Neha Jhulka, Kousalya, Sayaji Shinde, Kavitha, Jayaprakash Reddy, Krishna Bhagawan, Raghubabu, Shakuntala, Venumadhav, Suman Shetty, Dharmavarapu, Babloo and Others.
Art: Ashok.
Action: Ram-Laxman.
Cinematography: Ajayan Vincent.
Dialogues: Sainath.
Editing: Marthand K. Venkatesh.
Music: Ramana Gogula.
Direction: Kotasatyanarayana E. (Sattibabu).
Producer: Smt. Lagadapati Sireesha Sridhar.
Banner: Ramalaxmi Cine Creations.
Release Date: 1st November, 2007.

Labels: , , ,

"ATHIDI" Movie Review


Maheshbabu and Amrita RaoAfter a blockbuster Pokiri and a dismal Sainikudu, Mahesh's latest movie is Athidi. This is Surender Reddy's third flick after Athanokkade and Ashok. While the former seems to favor single word titles and the latter titles that begin with 'A', Athidi is better than both the actor and director's previous movies, i.e., Sainikudu and Ashok respectively. The first half is gripping and the second half has a lot of violence and twists.

Plot Amrita's parents take in an poor orphaned boy and name him 'Athidi'. They are killed by an insane robber and Athidi is caught at the scene of the crime holding the gun. He is sent to juvenile prison for 13 years. When he comes out, he is full of revenge and hatred for any criminal, and wants to seek out the murderer of Amrita's parents. Amrita is a pretty young girl now; she doesn't know his identity and falls in love with him after a chance meeting. Meanwhile, a ruthless criminal known for his kidnappings, 'Kaizer', is terrorizing the state. Ajay Shastri is the cop in charge of catching him and his gang. Athidi finds out that Amrita is under threat, and in a series of bizarre weaves and turns, seeks out the wrongdoer.

Story, Screenplay and Direction Athidi has enough elements to be getting along with-a sympathetic character who is stuck at the scene of the crime and gets punished is the main element. Then there is the girl in question, who he wants to protect. This makes up most of the first half, while 'Kaizer', the villain remains a mysterious enigma terrifying the public and keeping the police force busy with his crimes. So it is gripping enough, with a strong central character, a female lead who is a part of the main storyline and a larger than life villain. Oh, some fights, some comedy and some music too.

Then the second half begins well. But it has several twists, and many climaxes. One solution leads to another problem, which needs to be solved and so on. The twists keep the viewer occupied, but seem a little forced at times. The last action sequence is more like a video game, and with a lot of violence and bloodshed.

The cinematography and editing are good. The song 'Satyam Emito' has been picturized well. The sub-plots intertwine with the main somewhere, but still there seem to be too many. The scene where Athidi discovers Amrita's identity and later when she discovers his; the scene where he chooses his little cousin over her when the kidnapper gives him a choice, the scene where the MLA puts his foot in the mouth regarding Kaizer and the cop after him are some of the good scenes. The scene where Suneel and Brahmanandam make Mahesh drink is comical.

Ashish Vidyarthi and MaheshbabuPerformances Mahesh is very good-controlled and consistent. He has obviously worked on the character, and that becomes a plus point for the movie. He has come a long way from his debut, and his voice modulation and body language show that. Credit must be given to the writer for creating a consistent character too, and for not entrusting him with too many dialogues.

Murali Sharma is generally a good performer, but his character is such that he becomes a little loud towards the end. Amrita Rao has done better work than this, but she's convincing. Her chemistry with Mahesh is not bad too. Subbaraju-Mahesh scenes are reminiscent of Pokiri. Suneel, Brahmanandam and Venumadhav are brought in to add the comic element and do just that. Nasser is good and Kota Srinivas Rao gives a repeat performance. The little girl is okay; Venu and one other guy as Mahesh's friends justify their roles. Ashish Vidyarthi is comical-those braids suit Amrita more than Vidyarthi.

Music and Dance 'Satyam Emito' is shot well. The item number with Malaika Arora, 'Rathraina' could have been so much better. The rest of the songs are okay. The background music towards the end is good and suits the sequences.

Last Word The plot keeps the attention of the viewer intact. There could have been less of those 'clever' little u-turns and some more light moments. The stylized picturization, reasonably good music and performances, heavy action sequences and some touching moments make Athidi watchable.

End Credits

Starring:
Maheshbabu, Amrita Rao, Murali Sharma, Nasser, Ashish Vidyarthi, Brahmanandam, Suneel, Venumadhav, Ajay, Kota Srinivasa Rao, Subbaraju and Others.
Art: Srinivas Raju.
Action: Stun Shiva.
Cinematography: Sameer Reddy.
Dialogues: Abburi Ravi.
Editing: Goutham Raju.
Music: Mani Sharma.
Rachana Sahakaram: Vakkantham Vamsi.
Story, Screenplay & Direction: Surender Reddy.
Producer: G. Ramesh Babu.
Presenter: UTV Motion Pictures.
Banner: Krishna Productions Pvt. Ltd.
Release Date: 18th October, 2007.

Labels: , , ,

"LAAGA CHUNARI MEIN DAAG" Movie Review



Rani Mukherjee Laaga Chunari Mein Daag is director Pradeep Sarkar’s second venture, after the successful Parineeta. Parineeta was a known story, but the performances, screenplay, art, music and the lead pair worked for the movie. Laaga...is a new script, but it’s an old story, and just too predictable. Parineeta was a Vidhu Vinod Chopra production, and this one is Yash Raj-somehow the difference becomes evident, with the same director’s taking being different in each movie.

Plot Vibhavri and Subhavri a.k.a. Badki and Chutki are living with their parents in an ancestral home with their once-rich now-penniless parents. Badki is aware of her parents’ position, with a court case for the acquisition of the house by her uncle, her father’s ill health and no money for anything. She goes to Mumbai for a job, and fails to get one owing to the lack of good education or English speaking skills.

Story, Screenplay or Direction The storyline is cliched, but the twists look forced. One major flaw is when she decides to become an ‘escort’, and Michelle (Suchitra Pillai) gives her the idea and a makeover. Somehow, the desperation comes across but the decision scene is totally flawed. It drags to that point, then it is hurried. The relationship between Rani and Abhishek, and the climax looks completely fake. The first half and the climax are predictable.

This follows a format. Unemployed men, a girl, a sub-plot, cops, goons and confusion. Within the format, it is good. It doesn't make for memorable cinema and it is a one-time watch.

The second half has some interesting parts, with Konkona coming and staying with her escort sister, without knowing her double life. The three Bong women in the cast-Jaya, Rani and Konkona give good performances. The first song, ‘Hum toh Aise Hai Bhaiyya’ shot on the banks of Ganga is good. That’s where the good part begins and ends.

The sewing-machine bound mother, the penniless but proud father, the evil uncle with his evil eye on their large ancestral home and his equally evil son-all such stereotyped characters. There is absolutely no subtlety in the writing, the crucial scenes and the characters. Rani and Konkona’s costumes while in Benares are really nice, courtesy Sabyasachi.

Jaya Bachchan Performances Rani and Konkona are the reason one manages to sit through the movie. They light up the screen and make the best of the shaky script. Abhishek Bachchan’s cameo is dumb, no other word for it. Kunal Kapoor is natural. Anupam Kher hams. Tinnu Anand and Sushant Singh have badly written characters to portray. Harsh Chayya and Murali Sharma are good. Tarana, Ninad Kamat and Suchitra Pillai do justice to their roles. Hema Malini’s special appearance is alright.

Song and Dance ‘Hum to Aise…’ is lovely and warm. ‘Kacchi Kaliya’ is hummable but badly choreographed.

Last Word This movie has several daag (stains) on it. The script and the climax are flawed, and only a few sequences of the movie really have something in it. Otherwise, it’s a big-budget production and a really average movie.

End Credits

Starring:
Abhishek Bachchan, Rani Mukherjee, Konkona Sen Sharma, Jaya Bachchan, Anupam Kher, Kunal Kapoor, Hema Malini, Murli Sharma, Kamini Kaushal, Harsh Chhaya, Tinu Anand, Sushant Singh, Tarana Raja, Suchitra Pillai, Ninaad Kamat and Others.
Art: Pradeep Sarkar, Eldridge Rodrigues, Kesto Mondal & Tanushree Sarkar.
Choreography: Howard Rosemeyer.
Director Of Photography: Sushil Rajpal.
Editing: Kaushik Das.
Lyrics: Swanand Kirkire.
Music: Shantanu Moitra.
Screenplay & Dialogues: Rekha Nigam.
Sound Design: Bishwadeep Chatterjee.
Director: Pradeep Sarkar.
Producer(s): Aditya Chopra & Pradeep Sarkar.
Banner: Yash Raj Films.
Release Date: 12th October, 2007.

Labels: , , ,

"TULASI" Movie Review


Venkatesh and Nayanatara Tulasi is Venkatesh's latest release after two hits-Laxmi and Adavari Matalaku Ardale Verule. Laxmi has a feminine name, but it is one of the few movies of Venkatesh which has an ample dose of action. In that movie, Laxmi leads a sort of double life, where he can be violent and bash up the baddies, and then be a silent and strong boss. Tulasi is again a feminine name, a strong character, a double life of sorts. The screenplay in both the movies uncovers some twists at sudden junctures.

Plot Tualsi and Vasu are living separate because Vasu cannot take his violent streak. He comes to Bangalore and stays in the same flats where she and their son Harsha reside. Much to her disdain, their five year old discovers that Tulasi is his father and they become close. She asks the owner (Ali) to get rid of him and it reaches the ears of some goondas that he is staying there. The reason the goons are after him and the violence that tore this small family apart becomes clear. The urgent reason they need to get together now also become evident.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The story is pretty straight forward. It's the screenplay which is taut and aims to surprise the viewer. The very beginning is a silly/laughable fight sequence, then a soppy family drama begins and finishes off with a brief flashback. It alternates between present and flashback even in the second half. The climax drags a bit, but that is crucial to the plot.

There are three angles in the story: one, father-son relationship; two, a love story that starts and ends quickly, and three, a violent action-packed 'Seema' angle that is supposed to accelerate the drama. To the director's credit, it is less of faction and more of wrong place, wrong time for the ever-sacrificing Venkatesh. The love story is brief, and the father-son angle does not get too mushy for words and leaves breathing space.

All the action is set in Bangalore, and a sub-plot is thrown in unnecessarily. The humor part is not that high, with Ali's character falling flat and failing to generate many laughs. The dialogues and editing are adequate. Two questions: what kind of a man takes three bullets and a deep stab with the knife and still fights? What kind of a girl leaves a gravely injured man who happens to be her estranged husband lying on the ground? Venkatesh and Nayanatara, that's who.

Venaktesh and Nayanatara Performances Venkatesh has the film on his toned shoulders, and does a good job. Nayanatara and Venkatesh share a good chemistry on camera. The little kid is good enough, thankfully without trying to act too cute. Ashish Vidyardhi and Subbaraju do a good job. Ali is okay, Narsing and Uttej justify their roles and Ramya Krishna is convincing as Dr Surekha. Jhansi is a laugh roit.

Music and Dance Two of the songs are good, while the rest are just about okay, including the title song.

Last Word A little more humor and a little less dragging would have done this movie and the audience a favor. Still, Tulasi manages to float rather than sink completely. It is not disappointing, but not Venkatesh's best yet. With the kind of reach and experience production houses like SP and stars like Venkatesh have, you expect bigger and better things each time. That, sadly, one doesn't get in Tulasi.

End Credits

Starring:
Venkatesh, Nayanatara, Sivaji, Shriya, Ramyakrishna, Athulith, Jayaprakash Reddy, Sravan, Allari Ravi, Ashish Vidyarthi, Subbaraju, Riyaz Khan, Eshwar Reddy, Rahul Dev and Others.
Action: Ram-Laxman, Kanal Kannan.
Cinematography: Bala Murugan.
Dialogues: Paruchuri Brothers.
Editing: Marthand K. Venkatesh.
Lyrics: Chandrabose-Bhaskarabhatla-Sahithi.
Music: Devisri Prasad.
Story: Akula Siva.
Screenplay & Direction: Boyapati Srinu.
Producer: Suresh.
Presenter: D. Ramanaidu.
Banner: Suresh Productions (P) Ltd.
Release Date: 12th October, 2007.

Labels: , ,

"PELLAINDHI KAANI" Movie Review



Kamalini Mukherjee and Naresh Pellaindi Kani is EVV Satyanarayana's latest release, starring Naresh, Kamilini Mukherjee and Harish, re-entering after a long gap. Contrary to EVV's usual laugh a minute Aesop's fables, Pellaindi Kani is full of sentiment, mush and some more mush. There are a few one-liners and some light moments, but this is more like EVV's Ammo Okato Tariku than hits like Aa Okkati Addaku or his recent Kitakitalu. It's not bad, but that's the best that can be said about it.

Plot Acchi Babu is mentally not alright after a fall at age ten. His widowed and rich mother Rajeshwari sets out to get him married, hoping that will cure him. Gayathri is the chosen bride, who is in love with good-hearted Shivaji (Harish). He tells her to marry Acchi Babu because his mother promises to help her with her father’s surgery. Acchi Babu’s greedy uncles and their wives have their evil eye upon his property. They play their tactics, which result in many twists and turns with the innocent lives.

Story, Screenplay and Direction The story is pretty old-school. Urban audiences might not identify with the orthodox ways shown in the rural-town setup in the movie. A lot of screen time is dedicated to Rajeshwari waiting for her son and daughter-in-law to consummate their marriage, which doesn’t happen. Naresh as a mentally ill person does reasonably well, but falters a lot in the first half.

All the characters are flat, and are typical stereotypes-kind and rich mother, evil and greedy siblings, a sacrificing wife, a loyal servant (Sunil). This could have been an endearing story about an unusual marriage and a willing sacrifice. This could have been about loyalty and friendship. All these elements are present, but somehow pale when stronger elements dominate the movie, like typecasts and clichés.

That said, the movie does have its moments. The relationships between each character are the highlights. Mother and son, mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, a wife trying to come to terms with her challenged husband, etc. Naresh, Sunil and Harshavardhan’s characters are well-written.

Naresh and Kamalini Mukherjee Performances Naresh is inconsistent in the first half, but more convincing in the second. He gets into the skin of the character by that time. Harish is okay, and Kamilini is subtle. Bhanupriya is good, Kota and Krishna Bhagwan and their respective wives are typical. Sunil plays a well-written character after a long time. Harshavardan is good, making a spoof out of his own crime show.

Music and Dance Average and forgettable.

Last Word The first half is okay. The second half is full of sentiment. The climax drags a little. The music is not up to the mark. Overall, it’s an average movie with some pluses. The same script, with more sensitive handling, would have made a superior movie. But all the commercial trapping make it pretty average.

End Credits

Starring:
Naresh, Harish, Kamalini Mukherjee, Bhanupriya, Suneel, Chandramohan, Kota Srinivasa Rao, Mallikarjuna Rao, MS Narayana, Krishna Bhagawan, Kondavalasa, Kallu Krishna Rao, Namala Moorthy, Harshavardhan, Raghava, Shashank, Pragathi, Sana, Jayalaxmi, Sudeepa, Anitha, Usharani, Uma and Others.
Art: KV Subbarao.
Cinematography: D. Prasad Babu.
Dialogues: Vegnesa Satheesh, D. Nagaraj, Balaram & Murali Mohan.
Editing: Goutham Raju.
Lyrics: Veturi, Varikuppala Yadagiri & Jayasurya.
Music: Kamalakar-Jayasri.
Story: K. Bhagyaraja.
Screenplay & Direction: EVV Satyanarayana.
Producer: M. Narasimha Rao.
Banner: Raasi Movies.
Release Date: 12th October, 2007.

Labels: , , ,

"BHAYYA" Movie Review



After Pogaru, Pandem Kodi and Bharani, Bhayya is Vishal's latest flick. He has that 'Mass' image, stories with Rayalaseema background, lots of fight sequences in all his movies. Bhayya is no different, but looks like it is a mash of so many other movies. It is unoriginal and unexciting and even the 'mass' audience will yawn widely-we've seen it all before.

Vishal and PriyamaniPlot Jagan lands up in Kadapa at his police inspector uncle's (Ashish Vidyarthi) place, having to sign at the police station under some minor offence. He falls in love with Malathi (Priyamani), but to avoid him she tells him she is in love with the murderous Mallanna's younger brother (Ajay). The goon gets to know about it, and harasses the girl and interrupts her studies. Jagan plays savior and it's a fight to the finish.

Story, Screenplay and Direction It's all been done before. The Rayalaseema backdrop, SUVs in and out of the frame, six fights and six songs, a damsel in distress and the Hero who saves the day. The problem here is that Vishal himself is giving a repeat performance in many ways. He does a flaw, and sets out to rectify it. Ashish Vidyarthi's character has a wife at home and a 'Chai-Bun' affair with his head constable. It's supposed to be funny. The Tamil-Telugu gap has not been bridged consistently.

Some clever scenes: two groups following Jagan think he is heading the other group and leave. Dogs set against him are friendly to him instead of listening to the owner. Mallanna plants his men in Jagan's camp, and Jagan outwits him by planting his men in Mallanna's camp. Jagan keeps a Tolet board outside Malathi's house with Mallanna's number, and his henchman calls Mallanna to enquire. One hitch-all of them are reminiscent of some movie or the other, from the recent Dhol (Hindi) to Okkadu.

The action or the technical departments are routine. Comedy, although seen before, works in some places. There is no chemistry between the lead pair.

VishalPerformances Vishal is consistent, but does nothing different from his previous flicks. Priyamani and Vishal do not look right together, and she has a role that requires her to do nothing but cry/dance. Ajay gives a good and convincing performance. Devaraj as Mallanna and Ashish Vidyarthi in a surprisingly positive role justify their roles.

Music and Dance Average.

Last Word Vishal has is a promising talent, but it's wasted in repeat shows like this.

End Credits

starring:
Vishal, Priyamani, Ashish Vidyarthi, Devaraj, Ajay, Urvasi and Others.
Action: Kanal Kannan.
Cinematography: Vaithi.
Dialogues: Shashank Vennelakanti.
Editing: G. Sasikumar.
Lyrics: Veturi-Vennelakanti-Sahithi.
Music: Mani Sharma.
Story, Screenplay & Direction: Bhoopathy Pandian.
Producer: Vikram Krishna.
Banner: GK Film Corporation.
Release Date: 5th October, 2007.

Labels: , ,

"CHIRUTHA " Movie Review



Neha Sharma and Ram CharanThe expectations and the hype surrounding Chiranjeevi's son Ram Charan and his debut flick Chirutha are phenomenal. After the blockbuster Pokiri and the highly successful Desamuduru, Puri Jagan is back with Chirutha. It's a revenge drama with a love story angle. The movie is average, with a done to death approach. Ram Charan does reasonably well for a newcomer.

Plot: Charan's father (Surya) witnesses 'Bhai' (Ashish Vidyarthi) murder a man so he tries to kill him and his wife. The father dies while the mother might survive, so the money to operate her requires Charan to sacrifice his freedom and go to jail on someone's behalf. 12 years later, he is in Bangkok working for a travel agency and in love with a spoilt rich brat Sanjana (Neha Sharma). She comes to Bangkok and his agency takes care of her tour. She falls for him too, but his real motive is revenge.

Story, Screenplay and Direction: The story is like any other revenge drama. The love story angle is a rich spoilt girl-poor unfortunate boy thread. The screenplay is a little shoddy in the second half. The direction is typical Puri Jagan, but it is between his best like Idiot and Pokiri and his worst like Super and 143. The script is not strong, and that is the main weakness of the movie.

Now the characters-Charan's character is well-written and Ram Charan obviously put a lot of work into it, though he oscillates between confidence and self-consciousness in front of the camera. Sanjana is an unbearable character, the sort of extremities Puri excels in. Dharmavarapu, Ali and Brahmanandam's characters add the necessary humor. Ashish Vidyarthi as the villain is just too commonplace and the character has not been worked upon at all.

The first half moves quickly. After the break, we see glimpses of a number of movies. Kaho Naa Pyaar Hai tops the list. Being marooned on an island, the lead pair getting close there and finally being rescued only to further the drama is all from that story. The climax fight is good, but the whole 'mud pack' sequence reminds one of Oke Okkadu. The introduction fight is also good. A large chunk of the movie is in fact dominated by songs and fights.

Scenes to watch out for: Intro scene, first song, the scenes where Charan teaches Sanjana to behave (much to everyone's relief) and the scene where Charan meets his mother.

Dialogue of the day: Kuturu Kante Kukkanu Penchukovadam Melu.

Babloo, Ram Charan and UttejPerformances: Ram Charan's efforts have borne fruit. The expectations with which he has arrived are unfair, though his opportunities are obviously ample. He has made use of those opportunities-one cannot compare him to Chiranjeevi, Pawan Kalyan or even cousin Allu Arjun. For a debutant, he has done well. His fights are excellent, though his dances are stiff even if he pulls off all the complicated steps. He doesn't look totally like his star father, and his mannerisms or style will need a few more movies to actually develop.

The female lead is Neha Sharma, and though she does justice to the given character, it is slightly loud. Dharmavarapu, Ali, Brahmanandam deliver the laughs. Prakashraj gives a repeat performance, as does Sayaji Shinde. The actor who played Biku is okay, and Ashish Vidyarthi makes a regular villain. Surya and Pragathi as Charan's parents are convincing.

Song and Dance: Songs start off suddenly but the picturizations are good. The background score is okay, better towards the end. Rishi Rich's 'My eyes on you' has been used well in the first half.

Last Word: Chirutha is a baby step for Ram Charan, but he is a promising and hardworking talent. It will take time for him to blossom. As for the movie, it is average and we've been there, seen that.

End Credits

Starring: Ram Charan, Neha Sharma, Prakashraj, Dharmavarapu, Surya, Pragathi, MS Narayana, Babloo, Ali, Ashish Vidyarthi, Sayaji Shinde, Uttej, Ganesh and Others.
Action: Vijayan.
Art: Chinna.
Cinematography: Shyam K. Naidu.
Editing: Varma.
Lyrics: Sirivennela, Bhaskarabhatla, Kandikonda, Viswa & Rama Jogaiah Sastry.
Music: Mani Sharma.
Story, Screenplay, Dialogues & Direction: Puri Jagannath.
Producer: C. Ashwani Dutt.
Presenter: C. Dharma Raju.
Banner: Vyjayanthi Movies.
Release Date: 28th September, 2007.


Labels: , , , , ,

Powered by Digidreams